In Re Kavanaugh

In Re KavanaughStoryRecordDiscussion

An Unprecedented American Shitshow

Without any doubt, no matter which side of the political divide and/or substantive issues you come down on, the 2018 Senate confirmation hearings for seating Judge (now Justice) Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court comprised the greatest public “shitshow” spectacle in American judicial history (eclipsing both the Robert Bork hearings of 1987, and the Clarence Thomas / Anita Hill hearings of 1991 ). Much has been written on the matter, so for now the main function of this Case Study on this website is limited to being only archival, not analytical. Even so, the account here will/must remain far from complete, given that the full story is so voluminous and yet to be fully processed.

Backstory; Nomination; Hearings; Confirmation; Swearing-In

Briefly, Brett Kavanaugh’s life is documented on his Wikipedia page . He’d been serving as a Judge of the Federal Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit since 2006, prior to his nomination on July 9 2018 by President Donald Trump to fill the seat of retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. His Senate confirmation hearings spanned on Sep 4 – Sep 27, including very dramatic appearances by Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh on Sep 27. On Oct 6 the full Senate voted to confirm Kavanaugh’s nomination, and he was sworn-in later that day (followed by a public ceremony the following day).

As soon as Kavanaugh was nominated, the shit started hitting the fan (ultimately evolving into a full-fledged shitstorm). While (i) some nontrivial amount of the original criticism was certainly motivated by partisanship (since Kavanaugh was universally/correctly regarded as a political — not just judicial — conservative), essentially (ii) all of it had some at-least-arguable basis in objective/rational fact, given that Kavanaugh’s life as a public servant was largely an open book, hence copiously/reliably documented.

And then, on top of that already-known history, came (iii) serious allegations of sexual misconduct (jibing with then-current “#MeToo Movement”), from a high-school acquaintance of Kavanaugh’s, Prof. Christine Blasey Ford (and others). And then again, (iv) Kavanaugh’s alcoholism became exposed when the book, Wasted: Tales of a GenX Drunk , published by Mark Judge , another high-school classmate of Kavanaugh's, surfaced. And then yet again, (v) the public was subjected first-hand to the coup de grâce of Kavanaugh’s own absurd performance of anti-judicial-temperament (especially his irrational hatred of Democrats/Liberals) at his Senate confirmation hearings. And then finally, even (vi) a sham FBI “investigation” ensued. (vii) Etc.!

In sum, all of this craziness “sealed the deal” for many/most serious Americans: Kavanaugh is certainly guilty of multiple charges of Judicial Misconduct, and really doesn’t belong anywhere in the Federal Judiciary, much less on the Supreme Court, in any sane model of American society. For example, notably, 2400+ law professors publicly objected to Kavanaugh . (Hint to readers: this is a good opportunity to exercise your “Google kung fu.” Knock yourselves out, kids …)

But, rather than attempting to give here a long connected/discursive account of the whole sordid affair, we just let the above summary suffice (since we’re interested only in the Judicial Misconduct aspects, not the whole bloody thing).

Complaints Of Judicial Misconduct, Filed And Dismissed

While Kavanaugh’s Senate hearings were still in process, Complaints of Judicial Misconduct started pouring in against him — ultimately a remarkable 83(!) in all. On Dec 18 2018, these Complaints were released (in redacted format), at the same time they were dismissed (for brevity, the 3-digit numbers listed here are only the last three digits of the official long-form numbers, 10-18-90NNN, noting the gaps at 068, 108):

It’s very hard to see how the Founders’s ideals for the federal judiciary have been upheld in the Kavanaugh case. The federal laws/rules for Judicial Misconduct are a joke.